Norms and Decision Making
Educational leadership concepts referenced in this activity are discussed in:
Wang, V., Kaiser, S., & Mitchell, D. (2024). Educational Leadership and Organizational Management: Bridging Theory and Practice. Innovative Ink Publishing.
View the book .
Copy or email these notes to yourself.
No emails are collected. This opens your personal email app only.
1. Leaders learn cultural norms by participating-not by “reading the handbook” (p. 229-230)
- Cultural norms show up in everyday talk, events, reactions to change, and who participates (or avoids participation).
- Participation helps leaders notice “small clues” and identify who holds (and defends) the strongest norms.
- Participation + clues + unwritten leaders (p. 229–230)
2. “Undiscussables” are the warning signal-and leaders must make them discussable (p. 227-228)
- Barth frames undiscussables as issues everyone knows but avoids addressing publicly.
- Leaders have a responsibility to surface them, reduce harm, and initiate change.
- Undiscussables + leader responsibility (p. 227–228)
3. Preventing negative norms matters-and new leaders can accidentally create toxicity (p. 231-232)
- “Prevention is better than cure” is applied to organizational culture.
- Leaders can create toxic culture through omissions/commissions-especially by changing symbols, rituals, events, or systems without understanding impact.
- University examples include introducing tools/policies without consultation and triggering cultural backlash.
- Prevention + omissions/commissions + “too quickly” change (p. 231-232)
4. Technology can become a cultural “tribe,” and forcing standardization can turn toxic (p. 236)
- Device/platform preferences can form group cultures (Apple vs. Microsoft vs. Google Docs, iPads vs. laptops).
- When leaders force a single platform, the issue can become “undiscussable” and divisive.
- Leaders should avoid framing changes as personal preference and consider workload, training, compatibility, and cultural change.
- Technology as a cultural norm + risk of toxicity (p. 236)
5. Culture conflict becomes an ethical decision-making problem-facts + values + consultation (p. 238-239)
- Ethical standards may not align across leaders, staff, students, and community.
- Recommended approach: confront personal values, institutional values, and group values; establish facts (not just opinions); consult extensively; then communicate decisions and reasons.
- Leaders must accept responsibility for initiating resolution to prevent institutional/community toxicity.
- Ethical decision-making steps + leader responsibility (p. 238–239)
6. Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM): real leaders blend intuition and analysis (p. 249-250)
- NDM focuses on how people actually decide in complex, real settings (not ideal lab conditions).
- Leaders use pattern recognition from experience, then adapt actions as situations unfold.
- NDM overview (p. 249-250)
7. Trust is not “extra”-it is a background condition shaping decision acceptance (p. 253-254)
- Relational trust influences whether people believe decisions are fair and whether they cooperate.
- Institutional trust influences confidence in systems, policies, and leaders over time.
- Relational trust (p. 253)
- Institutional trust (p. 254)
8. Emotions shape judgment-ignoring emotion can distort decisions (p. 255)
- Emotions influence attention, interpretation, and perceived risk.
- Leaders need awareness of emotional dynamics (their own and others’) to avoid reactive or biased choices.
- Role of emotions in decision-making (p. 255)
9. Ethical decision making requires more than “rules”-it requires a structured moral lens (p. 258)
- Ethics is positioned as a key part of leadership decision-making, not an afterthought.
- Leaders must weigh duty of care, professional standards, and competing values.
- Ethical decision-making section (p. 258)
10. Decision quality includes implementation reality: communication + buy-in + follow-through
- Across the chapter’s themes (NDM, trust, emotions, ethics), the message is that “good decisions” fail if people don’t trust the process or understand the reasoning.
- Leaders must communicate decisions and rationales clearly to sustain legitimacy.
- Anchored in trust/emotion/ethics framing (p. 253–255; 258)
No emails are collected. This opens your personal email app only.
Notes copied! Paste into your email.
Required Textbook:
Wang, V., Kaiser, S., & Mitchell, D. (2024).
Educational Leadership and Organizational Management: Bridging Theory and Practice.
Innovative Ink Publishing.
Available through Kendall Hunt:
https://he.kendallhunt.com/product/educational-leadership-and-organizational-management-bridging-theory-and-practice
Chapter-based instructional simulations and discussion prompts on this page are original applied instructional design grounded in the cited text.